Amanda Agan
Amanda Agan is an Assistant Professor of Economics at Rutgers University. She holds a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Chicago.
Voting History
Reducing gun violence
Taking into account both potential implementation challenges and expected efficacy, investing in police-led targeted enforcement directed at places and persons at high risk for gun crime (e.g.,\"hot spot\" policing; gang enforcement) would reduce gun violence.
Vote | Confidence |
---|---|
Agree | 4 |
Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|
Agree | 7 |
Taking into account both potential implementation challenges and expected efficacy, investing in police-led focused deterrence programs (clearly communicating “carrots and sticks” to local residents identified as high risk, followed by targeted surveillance and enforcement with some community-based support for those who desist from crime) would reduce gun violence.
Vote | Confidence |
---|---|
Neutral/No Opinion | 5 |
Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|
Agree | 6 |
Comments
Some (weak) evidence that focused deterrence programs reduce violence (see e.g. Braga et al. 2019), recent RCT evidence shows no reduction. Increased police contact for targeted individuals is a cost.
Taking into account both potential implementation challenges and expected efficacy, investing in purely community-led violence-interruption programs (community-based outreach workers try to mediate and prevent conflict, without police involvement) would reduce gun violence.
Vote | Confidence |
---|---|
Neutral/No Opinion | 5 |
Median Survey Vote | Median Survey Confidence |
---|---|
Neutral/No Opinion | 5 |
Comments
Evidence on community-based programs like Cure Violence is weak and mixed (e.g. Butts et al. 2015)
Comments